In the last episode (Jan 05), Ronald F. Guilmette said:
> Martin Cracauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >When your code breaks when using -O2 or higher, don't do that, use
> >just -O!
>
> Ah, excuse me, but -O is equivalent to -O2.
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/toplev.c:4821
if (!strcmp (argv[i], "-O"))
{
optimize = 1;
optimize_size = 0;
}
So, -O is equivalent to -O1. Go down one page from there, and you'll
see the individual optiomizations enabled by each level. Also note
that for stock gcc, there is nothing above -O3 (If you see someone
using anything higher, you can be sure they're using pgcc). The -Os
flag automatically sets -O2.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: alt. C compiler Peter da Silva
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Warner Losh
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Thomas David Rivers
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Thomas David Rivers
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: alt. C compiler Peter da Silva
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Martin Cracauer
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Dan Nelson
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Martin Cracauer
- RE: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Charles Randall
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Oliver Fromme
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: [OFFTOPIC] alt. C compiler Warner Losh

