hm
i mean, do the hardware people want their stuff supported or not? that's
the main question
some seem to choose the NOT.
/k
Chuck Robey([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:44:42PM -0500:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote:
>
> >
> > I love the idea myself, but I have no power over FreeBSD :(
>
> You may not like the shape of the world, but I don't think getting
> publicly nasty about it is going to have any positive effect. It WILL
> have a negative effect, as FreeBSD would gather the reputation of very
> vindictive; it's even very likely that, somewhere along that road, a
> lawsuit over some wording would arise.
>
> You just can't get what you want all the time.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | electronics, communications, and signal processing.
>
> New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up
> fictitious words in the dictionary.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--
> Experiments must be reproducible; they should all fail in the same way.
http://www.webmonster.de http://www.apache.de http://www.splatterworld.de
(NIC-HDL KR433/KR11-RIPE)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
