On Saturday, March 04, 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Neither bash nor ksh claim to be particularly POSIX compliant. our
> /bin/sh does.
ksh doesn't claim to be POSIX compliant?
"ksh is intended to conform to the Shell Language Standard
developed by the IEEE POSIX 1003.2 Shell and Utilities Language
Committee."
-- http://www.kornshell.com/info/
And on a FreeBSD-compiled binary of the real AT&T ksh code:
$ echo ${.sh.version}
Version M 1993-12-28 i
$ for i in ; do echo $i; done
$
--
|Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Breakthrough: It nearly booted on the first try.
`------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: empty lists in for Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh) Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for (/bin/sh... Martin Cracauer
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for John Polstra
- Re: empty lists in for W Gerald Hicks
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for Max Khon
- Re: empty lists in for Chris Costello
- Re: empty lists in for David Scheidt
- Re: empty lists in for Arindum Mukerji
- Re: empty lists in for Christian Weisgerber
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton
- Re: empty lists in for Sheldon Hearn
- Re: empty lists in for Warner Losh
- Re: empty lists in for Doug Barton

