On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500, Dennis wrote: > > "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before > they are in commercial use. The fact that they're documented, does not imply that their documentation is also "good", though. Oh, and let us not forget that some vendors think their documentation of the system is not an essential 'part' of the whole thing, but it should come packaged in a separate bundle, and charged extra. - Giorgos Keramidas To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Joe Abley
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Nate Williams
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Chuck Robey
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Wes Peters
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Boris Popov
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Marco van de Voort
- Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... --> please t... Kevin Stevens
- Re: Is FreeBSD documented? Well, not in theory... Giorgos Keramidas
- Re: Is FreeBSD documented? Well, not in theory... Wes Peters
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Narvi
- Dennis' inability to fix the eepro driver Mike Smith
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix the eepro driver Narvi
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix the eepro driver Narvi
- Re: Dennis' inability to fix the eepro driver Dennis
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... W Gerald Hicks
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Zach Brown
- Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Ian Mondragon

