Sorry, been working a strange schedule this week. By resources, I meant kernel resources such as kmem space, from what I have been hearing though, it seems as though the kernel does a lot this stuff already. I dunno, but someone else posted awhile back about this, so I was still interested. Mike Smith had the audacity to say: > > > Well, it would be nice to auto-load or unload any module that is needed. > > not just ethernet and fs types. That's basically the idea. Say, if you > > load a driver that uses some resources that another one can use while the > > first one is off... that's what I'm talking about. > > "Some resources?" Er, no offence, but you're not making any sense. > -- Coleman Kane President, UC Free O.S. Users Group - http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bill Fumerola
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Chris Costello
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jeroen C. van Gelderen
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Mike Smith
PGP signature
