On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote:
> > No. Modules shouldn't be unloaded automatically.
^^
> but why? :-) what is wrong with that? it would be so nice to have small
> GENERIC kernel and bunch of modules. kernel will start, identify all
> hardware (pci/pnp) and than load appropriate modules. the only problem
> here is old hardware :(
You weren't listening..no-one debates the utility of auto-loading modules,
and that is the direction FreeBSD is already heading. The debate is over
the utility of automatically UNLOADING modules when they're "no longer in
use".
Kris
----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Wes Peters
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Nate Williams
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Mike Smith
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Boris Popov
- RE: kerneld for FreeBSD Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Kris Kennaway
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD void
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Bosko Milekic
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Andrew Kenneth Milton
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: kerneld for FreeB... Coleman Kane
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Jack Rusher
- Re: kerneld for FreeBSD void

