On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Colin wrote:
> [...] I honestly see no reason that what
> you're doing should work at all. Effectively you're telling your system that
> the way to connect to networks that it's address is not part of is to send a
> message to a host that is on a network it's address is not part of. It's a
> networking catch-22 ;)
It's not exactly a "catch-22", since the (perfectly valid) static route to
the default gateway's network takes precedence over the above rule (the
default route).
> Either you or your ISP needs to alias the adapter on
> this set of subnets, and if you're not the only person on this multi-netted
> section, it really should be them.
The ISP is giving away lots of /29 subnets and this is a kludge to provide
each client with 1 more useable IP. It's not easy to get many IPs these days.
> This is definately a routing bug, but it's in Win and Linux if they alloow
> this with no error.
Windows apparently allows the configuration even without the static route to
the gateway's network, which is very odd.
-mjy
--
***==> Marinos J. Yannikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
***==> http://pobox.com/~mjy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message