clemensF wrote:

>> Marius Bendiksen:
> 
>> Actually, our suser() implementation is pretty non-portable.
> 
> i take what i get.  when i can do "man [23] <func>", i approve of the
> consequences.

Too bad suser() is in section 9 then. :-)

-- 
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D

PGP signature

Reply via email to