Brian Somers wrote:
> Oops, sorry for the reply latency....
Don't worry, I've been side-tracked by docs stuff, committing things
then thinking "am I allowed to do that?", etc. Fortunately I haven't
been forced to wear the pointy hat yet. :-)
> I don't think it's appropriate to separate the security script into
> multiple scripts unless the intention is to run ``periodic
> security''. This is just my personal view though. If you feel
> strongly about it, you should bring it up on freebsd-arch. I'll
> certainly back down if the concensus says it should be split.
I don't really feel strongly, I just think it would be cleaner to have
it separated out. Alternatively perhaps /etc/security could be moved
to /etc/periodic/daily/<x>.security, since it's just another daily
script really. But that would mean a repo-copy and this probably isn't
important enough to justify that, so let's leave it be. People are
probably used to running '/etc/security' standalone as well.
>> Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D
>
> BTW, congrats on your commit bit !
Thanks. I took advantage of it to commit a question to the FAQ which
James (on the cc list) asked recently: "what is a repo-copy?", let
me know if it answers your question well enough. (it's in the misc
questions bit.)
--
Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / PGP: 0x99392F7D
FreeBSD Documentation Project /
PGP signature
