Michael Lucas wrote: > > My understanding of SMBFS is that it's not intended to be a server. > > It's a pretty solid client, though. I use it extensively, without trouble. > > ==ml > > > What's the current status the native smbfs support? Can it act as a both a > > client and a server? How does it compare to Samba in terms of functionality? > > > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message How did you implement SMBFS? Is it yet a part of FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE or? New kernel option? -- Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
