Warner Losh said:
> In message <199906102125.oaa28...@mag.ucsd.edu> Bill Huey writes:
> : Yeah, that's problematic and short sighted on their part. It's certainly
> : not a question of expertise from what I've seen since there are very
> : competent technical folks with strong acedemic CS backgrounds hanging
> : out on the list. It seems like more of an implementation issues than
> : and acedemic knowledge issue.
> :
> : I don't know what to think about this at this time, since I'm just
> : now getting into understand the Linux source tree.
>
> One reason that I stopped was that I couldn't keep up with
> understanding the changes. This means that all my time for learning
> linux has been wasted because almost all of it is now obsolete, and
> has been obsolete for a couple of years now. Most of the time that
> I've spent learning the BSD internals has paid off as it is still
> current.
>
Another thing:
Even if one depends on the docs for the VM in the new (Red)
Daemon Book, that person isn't too far away from the CURRENT
FreeBSD VM code. FreeBSD is likely closer to Lite/2 (even
with the VM changes) than almost anyone else, while keeping
up technologically.
--
John | Never try to teach a pig to sing,
dy...@iquest.net | it makes one look stupid
jdy...@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
