In message <19990702174337.d3...@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : So that makes three of us that believe the check should be agaist "no" : rather than "yes".
(setq check-against-no (+ check-against-no 1))
Warner Losh Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:43:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
In message <19990702174337.d3...@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : So that makes three of us that believe the check should be agaist "no" : rather than "yes".
(setq check-against-no (+ check-against-no 1))