On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > [Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers] > > > > Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to > > 'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC > > build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built > > with them, though. Also, although I caught and corrected a few spacing > > nits caused by chopping off five letters, there may be some I didn't > > catch. > > > > If no-one objects, I'll commit this to -CURRENT in a few days. > > Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances > where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with > /usr/include/net/bpf.h? > > In any case, this is a long overdue, and welcome change. Thank you. :) > > Doug
How would that conflict? "bpf.h" is a local include, so it's not the same include path set. Plus, it would only be included as <bpf.h> if -I/sys/net. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ gr...@freebsd.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message