On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, Boris Popov wrote: > > without needing yet another setuid binary/binaries.. > > Well, sysctl with list of pathes for user mounts looks good. > Configuration is simple and can be easliy changed at runtime. It is > always better to avoid setuid'ed binaries, this is more worse that > mount(8) can execute other mount_* binaries. > > However, as pointed by Mike Smith, enabling user mounts raises a > risc of kernel panics from, for example, corrupted floppy disk. This > should lead to more stronger *fs code.
Ahh, another discussion entirely, which I'm not going to get into without working code. :-) Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
