On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote: > Well, it seems Bruce objects to this.. I don't know why though. If > he's concerned about loosing the tightly integrated sio<->isa stuff > then I guess there could be an "osio" (old sio) or "isasio" or > something driver that remains isa-specific. I could well imagine this > could be important for older/slower machines.
Is he on the same page as the rest of us here? We're just talking about the probe/attach bits, and anywhere else that makes use of isa_get_foo() calls that could be handled via more abstract methods right? I don't get this non-maintainence maintainer role here. - Confused in Maryland. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [email protected] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
