On Tue Aug 10 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:53:47AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > just wanted to get some feedback for this tiny patch and if people think it > > makes sense. > > I almost agree with the part of the patch that removes excessive commenting > for the individual signals. But I do not see much sense in repeating the > text that would be better suited for the man page, like signal(3).
actually a lot of the comment is taken from signal(3). ;) i don't think however signals should be explained merely in one manual. sigaction(2) e.g. also documents the signals. so i thought having a brief explanation of the signals in signal.h would be helpful. plus as you said it gets rid of some of the individual signal-comments. cheers. alex -- a13x _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
