On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:27:36 +0300 Alexander Motin <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300 > > Alexander Motin <m...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> Yes, as I have said, at this moment empty ticks skipped only while CPU > >> is in C2/C3 states. In C1 state there is no way to handle lost events on > >> wake up. While it may be not very dangerous, it is not very good. > >> > > Too bad. I'd say that systems which are limited to C1 don't benefit > > much (or not at all) from your changes. > > I've solved it! :) > Yup, this definitely reduces the number of inerrupts on my C1-only system :) Now I'm seeing on the order of 100 to 200 interrupts/s instead of around 2300. I'll run this new kernel some more and see how stable it is. Thanks, mav! -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
