On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:12 AM, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 8:45:08 am Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 16.11.2010 16:29, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > Err, are there no longer hard links to all of the frontends for a given
>> > crunch? If so, that is a problem as it will make rescue much harder to
>> > use.
>>
>> Yes, probably this patch is not needed and it should be fixed somewhere in
>> makefiles. But currently rescue does not have any hardlinks:
>> http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/i386-i386/9.0-HEAD-20101116-JPSNAP/cdrom/livefs/rescue/
>>
>> And what is was before:
>> http://pub.allbsd.org/FreeBSD-snapshots/i386-i386/9.0-HEAD-20101112-JPSNAP/cdrom/livefs/rescue/
>
> That definitely needs to be fixed.
The .mk file wasn't being installed. Could someone please test
this patch for validity and commit it?
More importantly, why didn't the above build process, or tinderbox
fail properly with this change?
Thanks,
-Garrett
Index: share/mk/Makefile
===================================================================
--- share/mk/Makefile (revision 215333)
+++ share/mk/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
FILES= bsd.README
FILES+= bsd.arch.inc.mk
-FILES+= bsd.compat.mk bsd.cpu.mk bsd.dep.mk bsd.doc.mk bsd.dtrace.mk
+FILES+= bsd.compat.mk bsd.crunchgen.mk bsd.cpu.mk
+FILES+= bsd.dep.mk bsd.doc.mk bsd.dtrace.mk
FILES+= bsd.endian.mk
FILES+= bsd.files.mk bsd.incs.mk bsd.info.mk bsd.init.mk
FILES+= bsd.kmod.mk
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
