On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:25:27 am Mark Felder wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:49:11 -0600, Alexander Kabaev <kab...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The only extra quirk that said commit > > does is an optimization of a dlsym() call, which is hardly ever in > > critical performance path. > > It's really not my place to say, but it seems strange that if an > optimization is available people would ignore it because they don't think > it's important enough. I don't understand this mentality; if it's not > going to break anything and it obviously can improve performance in > certain use cases, why not merge it and make FreeBSD even better?
Many things that seem obvious aren't actually true, hence the need for actual testing and benchmarks. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
