On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:52:48 +0000 (GMT) Robert Watson
<[email protected]> wrote:
The one comment I'd make is that the MAC case should indicate that "The MAC
Framework" is supported, rather than mandatory access controls being
present -- the presence of the framework doesn't imply the presence of
mandatory access control policies.
Does
FEATURE(mac, "Mandatory Access Control Framework support");
look better?
Alternatively/additionally we could use mac_framework as the name of the
feature.
The above seems fine -- while I've been moving to names like mac_framework.h,
it's still "options MAC" and "security/mac", etc, and think that "mac" is the
most consistent options.
Robert
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
