:
:Presumably writing into these holes repeatedly is a none-too-efficient
:affair (requiring moving all the stuff on either side), or am I missing the
:point slightly?
:
:Dave :)
It isn't quite that bad, but it isn't a walk in the park either.
Since data blocks are referenced from a block table, inserting new
blocks is cheap. However, this means that data may not be physically
ordered in the file -- if your read crosses a block boundry it may require
an extra seek. FreeBSD's FFS does have the reallocblks feature turned
on and this will cause the filesystem to try to reorder nearby blocks,
but it was never designed to handle sparse files so....
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Filesystem holes Ryan Thompson
- Re: Filesystem holes Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Filesystem holes Wes Peters
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Ryan Thompson
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Ryan Thompson
- Re: Filesystem holes Ryan Thompson
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes David Preece
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Ryan Thompson
- Re: Filesystem holes Terry Lambert
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Peter Dufault
- Re: Filesystem holes Terry Lambert
- Re: Filesystem holes Peter Dufault
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon
- Re: Filesystem holes Leif Neland
- Re: Filesystem holes Matt Dillon

