On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> said: > >> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver >> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound >> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than that, >> what integration are you concerned about? > > The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only > user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there > to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the > resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation....
The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross build very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping something in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a second or third tier argument at best. Warner _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
