On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> writes:
Dag-Erling, do you have a timeline for getting started on the
ldns/unbound import?
I imported the code into the vendor tree, but did not proceed any
further as there was still no firm consensus at the time.
I believe the conclusion - to the extent that there was one - was that
people were fine with tossing out BIND and importing ldns to replace the
client bits, as long as we had suitable drop-in replacements for host(1)
and dig(1), but there was no consensus on whether to import unbound.
I'll start working on getting ldns into head this weekend.
I think ldns really is not what we want; can you defer this for a week
and we could chat in person, also wtih brooks around, next week?
There is a wwaayy larger thing to the picture of resolver libraries,
exspecially validating once, which includes standardization,
acceptance, application support, etc. and I admit there should be a
summary of that on the wiki but isn't yet as some of the things only
very last-weekishly materialized for real for us.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family._______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
