hi, there!
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Don Lewis wrote:
> } > > No one with any brains uses bash 1 for anything
> } > > anymore.
> }
> } > Then why is it there? To help up the port count? If it's not good, it should
> } > be nuked, IMHO.
> }
> } people still use it because it is smaller
> } obrien has already tried to remove it once (in Mar 1999)
> }
> } as for me -- I do not try to hunt bugs in bash1 and do not blame it.
> } my question was about unclosed pipe
>
> It appears to be a descriptor that your shell failed to close before
> execing your test program. Unless you do something out of the ordinary
> like run
> program 27>somefile
> the shell should only leave three descriptors (0, 1, and 2 for stdin, stdout,
> and stderr) open when it execs another program.
yes, I understand that. My point is that bash1 is still used and comments
about braindead people who use it should be redirected to /dev/null. I
think we should stop this thread.
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
