on 19/11/2012 03:53 Nathan Whitehorn said the following: > git would be a huge step backward from svn for the central repo in lots of > ways.
Dramatic statements ("huge", "lots") require dramatic evidence. > Besides being (in my experience) extremely fragile and error-prone and the Ditto ("extremely"). > issues of workflow that have been brought up, the loss of monotonic revision > numbers is a really major problem. Monotonic revision numbers are nice to have, but again, are they really of that major importance? > Switching SCMs as a result of a security > problem is also an action totally disproportionate with the issue that should > not be made in a panic. Having more [cryptographic] verifiability in the > release > process is a good thing; it is not strictly related to the choice of version > control system. With this part I entirely agree. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"