On Sep 14, 2013, at 15:24 , Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > > > On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Olivier Cochard-Labbé <oliv...@cochard.me> > wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > >> > >> IXIA ? For the timescales we need to address we don't need an IXIA, > >> a netmap sender is more than enough > >> > > > > The great netmap generates only one IP flow (same src/dst IP and same > > src/dst port). > > True the sample app generates only one flow but it is trivial to modify it to > generate multiple flows. My point was, we have the ability to generate high > rate traffic, as long as we do tolerate a .1-1us jitter. Beyond that, you do > need some ixia-like solution. >
On the bandwidth side, can a modern sender with netmap really do a full 10G? I hate the cost of an IXIA but I have not been able to destroy our stack as effectively with anything else. Best, George
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
