* Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001128 09:49] wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:43:17AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Matthew West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001128 05:35] wrote:
> > > Who do I prod to get someone to take a look at bin/12939 and bin/6183?
> > >
> > > I've been using both patches now since FreeBSD 4.0 and they make life
> > > a lot more pleasant when using quota on a machine with NFS mounts.
> >
> > These both look sorta hackish, if you could somehow figure a way
> > to determine if a mount is hung instead of these two fixes it would
> > be a lot better.
> >
> > bin/12939:
> > -l flag to ignore NFS mounts is hackish, what about smbfs and coda?
>
> How does 'ignore non-local mounts' (MNT_LOCAL in statfs()) sound?
Sounds good, but being able to do an interruptable/timeoutable
statfs would be even nicer.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
