In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aled Morris writes: >Shouldn't you use "kill(0, SIGSEGV)" ? Gratuitously verbose! raise(SIGSEGV); (To be fair, raise(SIGSEGV) is quite likely to just jump to the segfault handler without actually setting any signal bits, but who can tell?[*]) -s [*] I don't have a FreeBSD complete source tree handy, this is a general comment about arbitrary future libc implementations. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: cvs commit: sr... Matt Dillon
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: cvs commi... Aled Morris
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: cvs c... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: c... Peter Seebach
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was R... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: c... Matt Dillon
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was R... Assar Westerlund
- Re: Why not another style thread? (... Matt Dillon
- Re: Why not another style thread? (was Re: cvs c... Peter Seebach

