In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis writes: : 4.1 broke that "policy" rather badly. Perhaps its time to get rid of the : mbuf macros, as any change to that structure breaks binary compatibility in : the worst way possible. Agreed. There are too many things that have been MFC'd that change the interface and too little oversight of them. FreeBSD is better about not breaking things than many others, but we're far from perfect. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Bill Fumerola
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Taavi Talvik
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT mouss
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Bill Fumerola
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Taavi Talvik
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Bosko Milekic
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT mouss
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Mike Smith
- Re[2]: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Boris
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Michael C . Wu