Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
>
> > > Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is
> redefining
> > > the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value.
> > >
> > > free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous:
> >
> > Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'.
>
> You're saying the most common definition of "free" isn't no cost ?
That would depend on whether you're talking to Libertarians or KMart Shoppers.
Can we please take this off the hackers list?
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, a... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solar... Chris Dillon
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, S... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linu... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs ... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBS... Ken Stox
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBS... Jonas Luster
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Wes Peters
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Rik van Riel
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solar... Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Mutsaers
- Software Patents. Was Re: FreeBSD vs... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Software Patents. Was Re: Fr... Boris
- Software Patents. Was Re: FreeBS... Peter Mutsaers
- Re: Software Patents. Was Re:... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Software Patents PILCH Hartmut
- Re: Software Patents Dan Langille

