Hi everybody,

My little problem does not seem to make anybody enthousiastic, at which point that I am wondering if there is any GDB user on kernel dump listening over there ... Maybe I am on the wrong mailing list ? Or should I look for further help somewhere else ? Or is it that my explanations were not clear enough ?

I have found that issuing an 'info frame @ebp @eip' command could provide the beginning of a stack dump analysis. Now, I am trying to find out where is stored the stack frame of the current process when an interrupt occurs. Is there anybody who knows this ?

Regards

Xavier Galleri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Thank you for your answer,

It's difficult to believe that nothing more intuitive and immediate can be done to get the kernel stack of any process from a GDB session on a kernel crash dump. Does it mean that this is something that nobody ever need until now ?

Also, is there a mean to ask GDB to dump the kernel stack of the 'curproc' that has been interrupted at the time of kernel panic ?

Regards,

Xavier

diman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">

On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Xavier Galleri wrote:

OK, let's make it a bit clearer !
....
[skiped]
Now, if you've read my first mail, I was actually asking for help onhow 
to dump the stack of an interrupted process with GDB when the
kernelcrash occurs in the context of an isr. Actually, I would like to
know how I could dump the stack of *any* process at the time of the
crash. This way, I would be able to see where my user-land daemon was
lying in the kernel when the interrupt occurs.


To dump stack of *any* (all) process you may write a little kld
wich will:

1) go through a process list,
2) get tf_eip, tf_esp, tf_ebp of a process
3) get p->p_vmspace 4) read process stack frames and all you need by manually
written routine based on procfs_rwmem and old good 'pread'
(which dosn't work now)

Another way is to go through proc list and coredump all the
processes for future manual analisys.

I like such way.

Can anybody point me to some difficults wich can appear while
implementing this?

[skiped]








Reply via email to