Gordon Tetlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you are using apache (who isn't?), I highly suggest you look into using > suexec. That way bad CGI programming is offloaded to the customer and not > to your system. suexec has many weaknesses - amongst other problems, it does not set resource limits; nor does it chroot as far as I recall. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/sbin/... Peter Pentchev
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/s... David Malone
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /u... Peter Pentchev
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/s... Aleksandr A.Babaylov
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /u... mouss
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/... Matt Dillon
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/sbin/... mouss
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* in ... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/sbin/* in ... Gordon Tetlow
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/sbin/... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /usr/s... Tony Finch
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/* /u... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: Protections on inetd (and /sbin/... Andy Farkas

