:Thunderbird 900, with 256 MB of PC-133 memory, and using 3 - ATA-66
:HD's on different controllers. The elapsed time dropped from 58:16 to
:45:54 by using softupdates.
:
:Kent

    That sounds about right for -pipe.  The original email was
    1 hour vs 40 minutes, a 20 minute difference which seemed a bit
    high (what I would expect without -pipe).  46 minutes verses 58 minutes
    is only a 12 minute 20 second difference, which is more inline with what
    I would expect.

    Most of the savings is occuring during the dependancy and
    cleaning step(s).  The system creates and deletes a huge
    number of files in a huge number of directories and softupdates
    really helps there.

    Softupdates is not helping much during the actual compilation,
    which is a cpu-bound step if you use -pipe (the creation of the
    object files costs nothing because there is no other disk activity
    going on).

    The buildworld hits various choke points -- even with -j 128, if
    there are only 30 files in a library you will generally only see
    30 compiles going at once.  The final library link stage chokes
    it down to one process and this will become a pure bandwidth issue
    for your disk subsystem for a second or so (for the larger libraries).

                                        -Matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to