In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Lucas writes: : Is the Handbook correct, or are unified diffs preferred? I'll be : happy to fix my article and submit a PR to correct the Handbook if : this is the case. diff -c or diff -u is 1000% better than palin diff. That's what is ment by "context" in this context :-). I personally find diff -u easier to read, but there are others that find -c easier. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- context or unified diffs in PRs? Michael Lucas
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Alfred Perlstein
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Jordan Hubbard
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Jordan Hubbard
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? John Baldwin
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Michael Lucas
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Warner Losh
- Re: context or unified diffs in PRs? Joseph Scott

