:> SWAP is never touched. :)
:>
:> last pid: 23395; load averages: 2.08, 2.92, 3.60 up 0+01:29:58 02:03:27
:> 1529 processes:24 running, 1505 sleeping
:> CPU states: 40.5% user, 0.0% nice, 46.4% system, 1.1% interrupt, 12.0% idle
:> Mem: 705M Active, 1369M Inact, 332M Wired, 99M Cache, 265M Buf, 7504K Free
:> Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free
:
:A couple other people have mentioned that this is your swap load when
:the machine's quiet. MFS can exhaust your swap quickly, and if you
:scale these load numbers up by a factor of 10, I think you're going to
:touch swap. (Even here you're already down to 7M free mem.)
That is almost certainly what is occuring. Since swap is otherwise not
being used much, I'm going to retract my '3G of swap' recommendation
(though if you ever repartition your disks I would still do it).
You don't need 3G of swap, the 512M is fine as long as you scrap MFS.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded serve... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Ted Faber
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Ted Faber
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (3... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Greg Lehey
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... David Scheidt
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded s... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... Michael C . Wu
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0)... Matt Dillon
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (3... Paul Herman
- Re: tuning a VERY heavil... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) load... dannyman

