On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Willem van Engen wrote: > DRIVER_MODULE(smb, smbus, smb_driver, smb_devclass, 0, 0); > so I guess not. But thanks anyway :) Yes, but the 'smbus' bus driver doesn't have an attachment to your driver. You're trying to create a device that provides an 'smbus' right? Or did I totally misread your original post? -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | For Great Justice! | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- driver: probe not called when smbus child Willem van Engen
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Willem van Engen
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Takanori Watanabe
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Willem van Engen
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus chi... Takanori Watanabe
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Mike Smith
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Willem van Engen
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus chi... Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus... Willem van Engen
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Nicolas Souchu
- Re: driver: probe not called when smbus child Willem van Engen

