[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> She need's specific information that we need that we cant get
> unless we sign NDA's for the doc's so she can try and get them merged into
> a reference product somewhere between the datasheet (worthless) and the
> programming manual (NDA). I know this is not ideal or what bill, jonathon,
> or others want. They would rather Intel just get a friggin clue and stop
> being anal. And while in the long term this may change it isn't going to
> be soon. She is willing to compromise and try and get us doc's on the bits
> we need.
Let me just pipe in a bit. Compromise seems just like the kind of thing
marketing or legal would want to do. The problem is that _we_ cannot
compromise because one cannot write a "half-way there" driver. It's a
technical impossibility.
Now, if Bill Paul, Jonathan Lemon or whoever can come up with a
"compromise" that would work, fine. But otherwise, and I think otherwise
is likely, please explain the above to this person.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a rewarding life, but hey, somebody has to have all the fun,
right?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
