Benny Prijono wrote:
> Benny Prijono wrote:
> >
> > As far as I notice (I only briefly browse the web version though), the
> > difference between the printed and the online version is, the printed
> > version has nice summary table of conformance level test results,
>
> oops...
> second browse to the URL reveals that the results summary is also
> there:
> http://www.cuj.com/roundup/tables.htm
Yes I have read the complete article online yesterday and did quickly browse
through the zip files but no comparison between de various STL member
fuction implementations. For example the checked access subscripting on a
vector ( at() ) is not available in the GCC builtin STL but I cannot find
that detail in the zip-reports.
> additional info, Dinkumware has 2,000 individual tests against STL
> implementations, Perennial has 74,619 combined tests, while Plum Hall
> has 2256 tests. I assume the detail results are in those zip files in
> the URL.
Thanks,
Arjan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
