* Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010419 13:36] wrote:
> At 01:34 PM 04/19/2001, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
>
>
> > > Your point is moot, as you already have SMP support. The question is
> > > whether squeezing a few extra cycles out (SMPng) is worth making the OS
> > > significantly more complex, particularly when more computing power is
> > > always on the way.
> >
> >Much of the code is being simplified and cleaned up. And it's not a "few
> >extra cycles".
>
>
> I do admit im in a vacuum here, as I havent seen any 5.0 code. Im assuming
> it will be as ugly and problemattic as linux (which was unfortunately how
> this thread got started, but some linux moron crossposting)...and thats not
> fair as there are much better programmers in FBSD's camp than linux's. If
> its done relatively transparently, then its a big win. If it makes all of
> the drivers a new learning experience, then its not.
Look spanky, just take a look at the wi driver ok?
There, was that all too difficult?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.egr.unlv.edu/~slumos/on-netbsd.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
