Shannon Hendrix wrote:
>
> > And just to get things worse... :-) the test must be made on the *same*
> > slice. If you configure two different slices, the one on the outer
> > tracks will be faster.
>
> I cannot verify that with my drive, but my largest is 18GB so maybe
> the difference is not as pronounced as on some newer drives like those
> (currently) monster 70GB drives.
It should be measurable.
On one hand, more sectors per track, same time to read a single track =
more bytes read per second.
On the other hand, more sectors per track, more bytes per track, less
tracks per same size, less track seek needed.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wow regex humor... I'm a geek
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: technical comparison Gordon Tetlow
- Re: technical comparison Karsten W. Rohrbach
- Re: technical comparison Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: technical comparison Jason Andresen
- Re: technical comparison Hroi Sigurdsson
- Re: technical comparison Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: technical comparison Jason Andresen
- Re: technical comparison Shannon Hendrix
- Re: technical comparison Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: technical comparison Shannon Hendrix
- Re: technical comparison Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: technical comparison Shannon Hendrix
- Re: technical comparison Andresen,Jason R.
- Re: technical comparison julien
- Real "technical compari... Terry Lambert
- Re: Real "technical com... Rik van Riel
- Re: Real "technical com... Doug Barton
- Re: Real "technical com... Noses
- Re: Real "technical com... Rik van Riel
- Re: Real "technical com... Terry Lambert
- Re: Real "technical com... Noses

