: :Looking at the patch, is it safe to assume that if there's a '/' in a :hostname, it MUST be a AF_UNIX socket? If so, wouldn't a strchr(hostp, :'/') be better than 'hostp[0] == '/''? This way one can use relative paths :as well, not just absolute ones. : :-- :[ Joseph Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] [ http://srcsys.org ] 'maybe'. Generaly speaking, to ensure that we do not break some existing use of telnet it is best to be conservative. You can always do 'telnet -u relative_path' -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Peter Wemm
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Jacques A. Vidrine
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets... Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PA... Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Joseph A. Mallett
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Matt Dillon
- Re: telnet to AF_UNIX sockets [PATCH] Poul-Henning Kamp

