In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrew Hesford writes: : New "modules"? Isn't that just the same as /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ ? I side : with Mr. Dillon, I hope things stay the way they are. No. It isn't. Our current /usr/local/etc/rc.d is a *SUBSET* of what the NetBSD system provides. Right now it is a crap shoot if modules you depend on get started before you or not. The NetBSD system formalizes dependencies and uses them everywhere, not just in the "add on" part of the system. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Robert Watson
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Shannon Hendrix
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Kevin Way
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Gordon Tetlow
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Terry Lambert
- Run states (Was: import NetBSD... Mike Meyer
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Sergey Babkin
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Cyrille Lefevre
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Sergey Babkin
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Warner Losh
- import NetBSD rc system [summary] Warner Losh
- import NetBSD rc system [summary] Kevin Way
- Re: import NetBSD rc system [summary] Garance A Drosihn
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Dave Hayes
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Warner Losh
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Brooks Davis
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Dave Hayes
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Jon Parise
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Mike Meyer
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Jon Parise
- Re: import NetBSD rc system Dave Hayes

