] This is all patently ridiculous, especially given that we know you
] have a previously declared bias in being able to sell some sort of
] installer for money and would clearly wish to kill any "competition"
] for it, no matter how benign it would be to otherwise include it as an
] option (which is all Nik was saying).
You are confusing me with Brett Glass. Yes, I believe that Brett
should have been permitted to do his thing, and replace the
installer. I personally would have liked to see a "Soft Updates"
style license, where Brett would sell for a year, and then the
code would revert to a simple BSD license.
] Whether you personally find any merit in sysinstall or not, and I'm
] often among the first to point out its many shortcomings, trying to
] kill it off for business reasons is just as obnoxious and
] Microsoft-ish as trying to kill off, say, RAID support because you
] just so happen to have a proprietary RAID solution you'd prefer users
] to use instead. Yeesh! Talk about a complete and total failure to
] get what FreeBSD is all about! I really have to wonder why you
] continue to hover around the community like a horsefly, year after
] year, without contributing anything but complaints about how things
] should be remoulded in your own image... It's a crock, Terry, and
] it stinks like a porta-potty in Texas at high noon.
Yeah, pull the other one.
PS: Speaking of RAID I'm the one who provided the patches that
made the user space version of RAIDFrame run on FreeBSD.
Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
