In a message dated 07/13/2001 12:41:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> >"If you have the space, 2U is better". Why is that statement so irritating
> to
> >you. Its a fact. you agree with it. So what is the problem?
>
> The problem is that you said that 1U solutions are inherently
unreliable,
> which is not true.
>
No, I said its "generally a bad idea", and that 2U were better for dual
processors than 1U, which they are. The bottom line is that you can use
"any-old" MB in a 2U, but you have to use a "specially engineered" one in a
1U to get reliability, which adds 100s of dollars at least with little or no
performance gain.
B
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
