> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:45:48PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > > > It's kinda late in the process to be complaining about this, but I just
>noticed this myself...
> >
> > Why not just symlink csh to tcsh then ?
>
> Because csh is hardlinked to tcsh instead.
Oh well, I missed that. But I think symlink would do just the same,
but it would be more obvious for user that csh is now the same thing
as tcsh. Is there any situation where symlink would not do the job
but hardlink would ?
Regards,
Eugene
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
