On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> [Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.]
Sorry mi, should have done that myself.
> If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > > > The DS10 is now rolling tarballs (with NODOC=YES) so that make release
> > > > appears to have run OK. I can try (overnight) a new make release without
> > > > the NODOC and see what tomorrow morning gives me.
> > > >
> > > > If that proves OK I think I put the resulting .iso up for download.
> > >
> > > That'll be good to see.
> >
> > ===> Installing for sgmlformat-1.7
> > ===> sgmlformat-1.7 depends on executable: onsgmls - not found
> > ===> Verifying install for onsgmls in /usr/ports/textproc/openjade
> > >> No directory for onsgmls. Skipping..
>
> Oh heck. Alphas build docs with openjade, not jade. We forgot to deal
> with that in the definition of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS}, so release builds
> containing docs but not a ports tree will break on the Alpha.
Not knowing much, if anything (ok, it is a green stone, I saw plenty
of Chines jade artwork while in Macau) about jade: why is the alpha
different from x86 in this respect?
Meaning: why not use common tools? [my ignorance around the docproj
stuff is showing here]
> OK. Can you apply the following patch to Makefile.inc.docports? It's
> against HEAD but it should apply equally well to RELENG4 because the
> files (modulo CVS strings) are identical.
I'll try when I get back home. I just managed to lockup the DS10 remotely
(grr) by typing "show power" against the SRM prompt.
> Due to the point in the release build where it matters, I think you can
> just patch your /usr/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports (i.e. it doesn't
> need to be checked in for the chroot area build).
>
> If this works, feel free to commit to HEAD (and with re's approval,
> RELENG_4). I'll be off-line for at least the next 12 hours.
It will probably not before Sunday afternoon (TZ=CEST) before I can
try this.
> > to be dependent on so much ports that are in flux when trying to build a
> > release
>
> No...we just forgot this aspect of the Alpha docs build. People who
> build releases with full ports should be fine.
You forgot the :-).. building all ports will take aeons (I suspect;
I would be surprised if it didnot)
> Sorry about that...
No problem, I'm not testing because I don't want to see problems ;)
> Bruce.
>
> PS. I just did this patch 10 minutes after waking up, no caffine yet.
> Your mileage may vary.
We'll see..
> Index: Makefile.inc.docports
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/release/Makefile.inc.docports,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -r1.6 Makefile.inc.docports
> --- Makefile.inc.docports 2001/08/14 22:31:27 1.6
> +++ Makefile.inc.docports 2001/08/25 14:49:01
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@
> ports/textproc/dsssl-docbook-modular \
> ports/textproc/html \
> ports/textproc/iso8879 \
> - ports/textproc/jade \
> ports/textproc/libxml2 \
> ports/textproc/libxslt \
> ports/textproc/linuxdoc \
> @@ -44,3 +43,8 @@
> ports/textproc/sgmlformat \
> ports/www/links \
> ports/www/tidy
> +.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha"
> +MINIMALDOCPORTS+= ports/textproc/openjade
> +.else
> +MINIMALDOCPORTS+= ports/textproc/jade
> +.endif
>
>
>
---end of quoted text---
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem, The Netherlands email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
