On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fixed
> this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bit of
> a pain. :( Perhaps it should use uint32_t? Or perhaps struct tsp should use
> its own variant of timeval with uint32_t or some such. Ugh.
If timeval is different sizes on different archs then I would
recomend the work be done take it to 64 bits, not 32. It fixes a
problem in about 30 years. :-)
--
Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
