In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These changes are performance fixes, not security fixes. I consider > them fairly significant performance fixes, but these bugs have been in > the TCP stack for literally a whole year without an outcry so I don't > see much justification for putting them into the security branch. > > -Matt
Yep, I agree 100%. The purpose of the security branch was spelled out clearly from day one. People who want something else can move to -stable. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
