Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Most likely he means a per-open(2) opaque datum that is kept in > >> struct file and passed to the underlying routines. > > > >Sorry, unbelievably bad at explaining myself. Per-open data is what i > >meant. The reason I'm interested is it would make a full nvidia driver > >port quite a bit easier. > > Sorry, I know of no current plans which adress this. > > The issue is non-trivial to fix because we currently don't pass > dup(2) events through the vnode layer.
Are you sure this is even necessary? They are talking about "per-open", not "per-fd-instance" data, which could easily exclude dup, dup2, and fcntl(f_DUPFD). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
