In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Poul-Henning Kamp  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes:
> >Yes, I think you're onto something now.  It's a 550 MHz. machine, so
> >the TSC increments every 1.82 nsec.  And 1.82 nsec * 2^32 is 7.81
> >seconds. :-)
> 
> In that case I'm almost willing to put an AnchorSteam on microuptime()
> being interrupted for more than good is in which case the splhigh() should
> cure it.

I'm testing that now.  But for how long would microuptime have to
be interrupted to make this happen?  Surely not 7.81 seconds!  On
this same machine I have a curses application running which is
updating the screen once a second.  It never misses a beat, and
userland is very responsive.

John
-- 
  John Polstra
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to